ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2024
Impact of patient habitus and acquisition protocol on iodine quantification in dual-source photon-counting computed tomography.
Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantitative imaging of the central lymphatic system with spectral CT iodine mapping: a feasibility study in swine.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Comparison of iodine quantification accuracy on prototype deep silicon photon-counting and energy-integrating detector CT.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Impact of vessel size, dose levels, and body habitus on iodine quantification in cardiovascular photon-counting computed tomography.The British journal of radiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Evaluation of iodine quantification accuracy with varying iterative reconstruction level, patient habitus, and acquisition mode on a first-generation dual-source photon-counting computed tomography (PCCT) system. Approach: A multi-energy CT phantom with and without its extension ring equipped with various iodine inserts (0.2 to 15.0 mg/ml) was scanned over a range of radiation dose levels ( Results: Overall, quantification of iodine concentrations was accurate and reliable even at ultra-low radiation dose levels. RMSE ranged from 0.25 to 0.37, 0.20 to 0.38, and 0.25 to 0.37 mg/ml for ultra-low, low, and medium radiation dose levels, respectively. Similarly, RMSE was stable at 0.31, 0.28, 0.33, and 0.30 mg/ml for tube voltage and source mode combinations. Ultimately, the accuracy of iodine quantification was higher for the phantom without an extension ring (RMSE 0.21 mg/mL) and did not vary across different levels of iterative reconstruction. Conclusions: The first-generation PCCT allows for accurate iodine quantification over a wide range of iodine concentrations and radiation dose levels. Stable accuracy across iterative reconstruction levels may allow further radiation exposure reductions without affecting quantitative results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.