ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal oncology2024
Multi-Omics analysis elucidates tumor microenvironment and intratumor microbes of angiogenesis subtypes in colon cancer.
Article in World journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analysis of intratumoural bacteria: Opportunities and challenges for cancer therapy.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2026Review
- The oncobiome; what, so what, now what?Microbiome research reports · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAngiogenesis plays an important role in colon cancer (CC) progression.
aimTo investigate the tumor microenvironment (TME) and intratumor microbes of angiogenesis subtypes (AGSs) and explore potential targets for antiangiogenic therapy in CC.
methodsThe data were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas database and Gene Expression Omnibus database. K-means clustering was used to construct the AGSs. The prognostic model was constructed based on the differential genes between two subtypes. Single-cell analysis was used to analyze the expression level of
resultsCC samples were grouped into two AGSs (AGS-A and AGS-B) groups and patients in the AGS-B group had poor prognosis. Further analysis revealed that the AGS-B group had high infiltration of TME immune cells, but also exhibited high immune escape. The intratumor microbes were also different between the two subtypes. A convenient 6-gene angiogenesis-related signature (ARS), was established to identify AGSs and predict the prognosis in CC patients.
conclusionOur study identified two AGSs with distinct prognoses, TME, and intratumor microbial compositions, which could provide potential explanations for the impact on the prognosis of CC. The reliable ARS model was further constructed, which could guide the personalized treatment. The
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.