Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39072096›Full record

ArticleACS omega2024

ToxTeller: Predicting Peptide Toxicity Using Four Different Machine Learning Approaches.

Jen-Hung Wang, Ting-Yi Sung

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jen-Hung WangInstitute of Information Science, Academia Sinica, Taipei 11529, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7102-8903
Ting-Yi SungInstitute of Information Science, Academia Sinica, Taipei 11529, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6028-0409

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Examining the toxicity of peptides is essential for therapeutic peptide-based drug design. Machine learning approaches are frequently used to develop highly accurate predictors for peptide toxicity prediction. In this paper, we present ToxTeller, which provides four predictors using logistic regression, support vector machines, random forests, and XGBoost, respectively. For prediction model development, we construct a data set of toxic and nontoxic peptides from SwissProt and ConoServer databases with existence evidence levels checked. We also fully utilize the protein annotation in SwissProt to collect more toxic peptides than using keyword search alone. From this data set, we construct an independent test data set that shares at most 40% sequence similarity within itself and with the training data set. From a quite comprehensive list of 28 feature combinations, we conduct 10-fold cross-validation on the training data set to determine the optimized feature combination for model development. ToxTeller's performance is evaluated and compared with existing predictors on the independent test data set. Since toxic peptides must be avoided for drug design, we analyze strategies for reducing false-negative predictions of toxic peptides and suggest selecting models by top sensitivity instead of the widely used Matthews correlation coefficient, and also suggest using a

Identifiers

PMID39072096
PMCPMC11270677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.