ArticleACS omega2024
Experimental Study on Factors Affecting Oil Recovery in Sandstone-Buried Hill Superimposed Reservoirs.
Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sandstone-buried hill superimposed reservoirs, characterized by the coexistence of the sandstone matrix and the fracture pore matrix, present unique challenges in integrated development due to their connectivity and physical properties. Currently, research on the factors affecting the recovery of sandstone-buried hill superimposed reservoirs with both porous and fractured media is limited. In this study, a more realistic method for preparing fractured cores and calculating fracture permeability was proposed, and the effect of confining pressure on fracture permeability was investigated. Additionally, a three-tube experimental apparatus was designed to study the effects of connectivity, different permeability contrasts between sandstone and buried hills, and various development strategies on recovery. The results indicate that fracture permeability is significantly affected by the confining pressure. When sandstone and buried hills are not connected, the total recovery is the highest. As connectivity increases, the recovery from sandstone gradually decreases, while the recovery from the buried hill gradually increases, leading to a decrease in the overall recovery. The permeability contrast between sandstone and buried hill has a minimal impact on the overall recovery; however, a higher permeability contrast leads to increased sandstone recovery and decreased buried hill recovery. The highest overall recovery was achieved with injection solely into the sandstone, followed by general injection, with the lowest recovery from injection solely into the buried hill. This study provides new insights into the integrated development of sandstone-buried hill reservoirs.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.