ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Genome-wide fine-mapping improves identification of causal variants.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fine-mapping refines genotype-phenotype association signals to identify causal variants underlying complex traits. However, current methods typically focus on individual genomic loci and do not account for the global genetic architecture. Here, we demonstrate the advantages of performing genome-wide fine-mapping (GWFM) with functional annotations and develop methods to facilitate GWFM. In simulations and real data analyses, GWFM outperforms current methods across multiple metrics, including error control, mapping power, resolution, precision, replication rate, and trans-ancestry phenotype prediction. Across 48 complex traits, we identify credible sets that collectively explain 18% of the SNP-based heritability (
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.