Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39071993›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2024

Data reconciliation of indoor positioning data: Improve position data accuracy in warehouse environment.

András Rácz-Szabó, Tamás Ruppert, János Abonyi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

András Rácz-SzabóHUN-REN-PE Complex Systems Monitoring Research Group, University of Pannonia, Egyetem str. 10, POB 158, H-8200 Veszprém, Hungary.
Tamás RuppertHUN-REN-PE Complex Systems Monitoring Research Group, University of Pannonia, Egyetem str. 10, POB 158, H-8200 Veszprém, Hungary.
János AbonyiHUN-REN-PE Complex Systems Monitoring Research Group, University of Pannonia, Egyetem str. 10, POB 158, H-8200 Veszprém, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article focuses on improving indoor positioning data through data reconciliation. Indoor positioning systems are increasingly used for resource tracking to monitor manufacturing and warehouse processes. However, measurement errors due to noise can negatively impact system performance. Redundant measurement involves the use of multiple sensor tags that provide position data on the same resource, to identify errors in the physical environment. If we have measurement data from the entire physical environment, a map-based average measurement error can be determined by specifying the points in the examined area where measurement data should be compensated and to what extent. This compensation is achieved through data reconciliation, which improves real-time position data by considering the measurement error in the actual position as an element of the variance-covariance matrix. A case study in a warehouse environment is presented to demonstrate how discrepancies in position data from two sensor tags on forklifts can be used to identify layout-based errors. The algorithm is generally capable of handling the multi-sensor problem in the case of indoor positioning systems. The key points are as follows:•The layout-based error detection is determined with the indoor positioning system measurement error.•This article shows how redundant measurements and data reconciliation can improve the accuracy of such systems.•Improving the accuracy of position data with the layout-based error map using a data reconciliation algorithm.

Indexed as

Data reconciliationIndoor positioning systemPosition dataWarehouse

Identifiers

PMID39071993
PMCPMC11277747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.