ArticleMolecular and clinical oncology2024
Age‑integrated breast imaging reporting and data system assessment model to improve the accuracy of breast cancer diagnosis.
Article in Molecular and clinical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancing mixed solid and cystic breast lesions diagnosis: a simplified scoring system integrating ultrasound features and clinical factors.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Age and tumor size as independent predictors of malignancy in BI-RADS 4 and 5 breast lesions: A cross-sectional study in Vietnam.PloS one · 2026Article
- Explainable machine learning for breast mass characterization and malignancy risk stratification: multimodal integration of AI-derived structured digital breast tomosynthesis features and peripheral blood immune-inflammatory biomarkers.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early diagnosis is an effective strategy for decreasing breast cancer mortality. Ultrasonography is one of the most predominant imaging modalities for breast cancer owing to its convenience and non-invasiveness. The present study aimed to develop a model that integrates age with Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) lexicon to improve diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography in breast cancer. This retrospective study comprised two cohorts: A training cohort with 975 female patients from Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University (Wuhan, China) and a validation cohort with 500 female patients from Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Hubei Province (Wuhan, China). Logistic regression was used to construct a model combining BI-RADS score with age and to determine the age-based prevalence of breast cancer to predict a cut-off age. The model that integrated age with BI-RADS scores demonstrated the best performance compared with models based solely on age or BI-RADS scores, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.872 (95% CI: 0.850-0.894, P<0.001). Furthermore, among participants aged <30 years, the prevalence of breast cancer was lower than the lower limit of the reference range (2%) for BI-RADS subcategory 4A lesions but within the reference range for BI-RADS category 3 lesions, as indicated by linear regression analysis. Therefore, it is recommended that management for this subset of participants are categorized as BI-RADS category 3, meaning that biopsies typically indicated could be replaced with short-term follow-up. In conclusion, the integrated assessment model based on age and BI-RADS may enhance accuracy of ultrasonography in diagnosing breast lesions and young patients with BI-RADS subcategory 4A lesions may be exempted from biopsy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.