Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39071961›Full record

ArticleData in brief2024

Annotated dataset for sentiment analysis and sarcasm detection: Bilingual code-mixed English-Malay social media data in the public security domain.

Mohd Suhairi Md Suhaimin, Mohd Hanafi Ahmad Hijazi, Ervin Gubin Moung

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Data in brief, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mohd Suhairi Md SuhaiminData Technology and Applications Research Group, Faculty of Computing and Informatics, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu 88400, Sabah, Malaysia.
Mohd Hanafi Ahmad HijaziData Technology and Applications Research Group, Faculty of Computing and Informatics, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu 88400, Sabah, Malaysia.
Ervin Gubin MoungData Technology and Applications Research Group, Faculty of Computing and Informatics, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu 88400, Sabah, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sentiment analysis in the public security domain involves analysing public sentiment, emotions, opinions, and attitudes toward events, phenomena, and crises. However, the complexity of sarcasm, which tends to alter the intended meaning, combined with the use of bilingual code-mixed content, hampers sentiment analysis systems. Currently, limited datasets are available that focus on these issues. This paper introduces a comprehensive dataset constructed through a systematic data acquisition and annotation process. The acquisition process includes collecting data from social media platforms, starting with keyword searching, querying, and scraping, resulting in an acquired dataset. The subsequent annotation process involves refining and labelling, starting with data merging, selection, and annotation, ending in an annotated dataset. Three expert annotators from different fields were appointed for the labelling tasks, which produced determinations of sentiment and sarcasm in the content. Additionally, an annotator specialized in literature was appointed for language identification of each content. This dataset represents a valuable contribution to the field of natural language processing and machine learning, especially within the public security domain and for multilingual countries in Southeast Asia.

Indexed as

MultilingualMultitask learningPublic security threatSarcastic sentimentSoutheast asia

Identifiers

PMID39071961
PMCPMC11283009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.