ReviewJournal of tissue engineering
Novel 3D printed TPMS scaffolds: microstructure, characteristics and applications in bone regeneration.
Review in Journal of tissue engineering. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Bridging the missing middle in osseointegration: meso-scale topography between macro design and microroughness.International journal of implant dentistry · 2025Pooled it
- Research Progress on the Structure and Properties of Medical Bone Implants Based on Additive Manufacturing.Micromachines · 2026Review
- Advances in 3D Bioprinting for Scaffold-Based and Scaffold-Free Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Additively Manufactured Partially Porous PAEK Topologies for Proximal Tibia Revision Cones and Sleeves.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Stress-driven design of intervertebral disc implants and optimization of mechanical and biological performance.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2026Article
- Comparative evaluation of additively manufactured PLA models as cost-effective, non-inferior alternatives to composite bones for pull-out testing.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2026Article
- Three-Dimensional Printing of a Spinal Interbody: Design Principles, Biomaterials, and Translational Considerations.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
- Alveolar ridge preservation with lyophilized microspheres of human dental pulp stem cells following 3D dynamic osteogenic induction.Stem cells translational medicine · 2026Article
- Patient-Specific Lattice Implants for Segmental Femoral and Tibial Reconstruction (Part 1): Defect Patterns, Fixation Strategies and Reconstruction Options-A Review.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Mechanical and biological properties of 3D printed bionic porous Gyroid structure implant.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2026Article
- Geometry-Guided Osteogenesis in Bone-on-a-Chip Systems Using Triply Periodic Minimal Surface Scaffolds.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Article
- Fabrication and evaluation of PLA/CPP/GO composite scaffolds: the role of graphene oxide content in regulating properties.RSC advances · 2025Article
- Tailored 3D Lattice Microstructures for Enhanced Functionality in Blood-Gas Exchange.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Implantable Dental Barrier Membranes as Regenerative Medicine in Dentistry: A Comprehensive Review.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2025Review
- The Role of Klotho in Oral and Maxillofacial Diseases: Mechanisms and Research Progress.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- A calcium sulfate hemihydrate self-setting interface reinforced polycaprolactone porous composite scaffold.RSC advances · 2025Article
- Review
- Effect of nHA/CS/PLGA delivering adipose stem cell-derived exosomes and bone marrow stem cells on bone healing-in vitro and in vivo studies.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Evaluation of triply periodic minimal surface geometries in 3D-printed PLA scaffolds for chondrogenic differentiation.Biotechnology progressArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bone defect disease seriously endangers human health and affects beauty and function. In the past five years, the three dimension (3D) printed radially graded triply periodic minimal surface (TPMS) porous scaffold has become a new solution for repairing bone defects. This review discusses 3D printing technologies and applications for TPMS scaffolds. To this end, the microstructural effects of 3D printed TPMS scaffolds on bone regeneration were reviewed and the structural characteristics of TPMS, which can promote bone regeneration, were introduced. Finally, the challenges and prospects of using TPMS scaffolds to treat bone defects were presented. This review is expected to stimulate the interest of bone tissue engineers in radially graded TPMS scaffolds and provide a reliable solution for the clinical treatment of personalised bone defects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.