Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39071859›Full record

ReviewImmunoTargets and therapy2024

Optimal Assessment, Treatment, and Monitoring of Adults with Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Strategies to Improve Outcomes.

Pierfrancesco Visaggi, Matteo Ghisa, Edoardo Vespa, Alberto Barchi, Amir Mari, Andrea Pasta, Elisa Marabotto, Nicola de Bortoli, Edoardo Vincenzo Savarino

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ImmunoTargets and therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. The Dynamic Evolution of Eosinophilic Esophagitis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  8. Introducing ICAM1 as a possible drug target in treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis.Gastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Pierfrancesco Visaggi *Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6985-5301
Matteo Ghisa *Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6026-5639
Edoardo VespaGastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, 20132, Italy.
Alberto BarchiGastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, 20132, Italy.
Amir MariGastroenterology Unit, Nazareth Hospital EMMS, Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-6828-4738
Andrea PastaGastroenterology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Elisa MarabottoGastroenterology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4507-8605
Nicola de BortoliGastroenterology Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Edoardo Vincenzo SavarinoDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3187-2894

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic type 2 inflammation-mediated disease characterized by an eosinophil-predominant inflammation of the esophagus and symptoms of esophageal dysfunction. Relevant treatment outcomes in the setting of EoE include the improvement of histology, symptoms, and endoscopy findings, quality of life (QoL), and the psychological burden of the disease. Established validated tools for the assessment of EoE include questionnaires on dysphagia and QoL (ie, DSQ, EEsAI, and EoE-IQ). More recently, esophageal symptom-specific anxiety and hypervigilance, assessed using the esophageal hypervigilance and anxiety scale (EHAS), have emerged as contributors to disease burden, confirming the importance of psychological aspects in EoE patients. The EoE endoscopic reference score (EREFS) is the only validated endoscopy score in EoE and can quantify mucosal disease burden. However, esophageal panometry using the functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) and high-resolution manometry (HRM) have shown potential to optimize the assessment of fibrostenotic features of EoE, providing novel insights into the pathophysiology of symptoms. There is a growing number of licenced and off-label therapeutic options in EoE, with various randomized controlled trials demonstrating the efficacy of proton pump inhibitors, topical steroids, food elimination diets, biological drugs, and esophageal dilatation. However, standardized optimal management strategies of EoE are currently lacking. In this review, we provide an overview of established and novel assessment tools in EoE including patient reported outcomes, FLIP panometry, HRM, endoscopy, and histology outcome measures to improve the outcomes of EoE patients. In addition, we summarize available therapeutic options for EoE based on the most recent evidence.

Indexed as

eosinophilic esophagitismonitoringtreatment

Identifiers

PMID39071859
PMCPMC11283784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.