ArticleArthroplasty today2024
Functional Articulating Antibiotic Spacers for Chronic Native Septic Knee Arthritis.
Article in Arthroplasty today, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Narrative over numbers: How testimonial medicine erodes safe practice.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026Article
- Hofmann articulating spacer vs preformed cement spacer two stage revision in native septic knee arthritis: a comparative study.International orthopaedics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Semipermanent functional spacers are now utilized for prosthetic joint infection in an attempt to avoid another surgery with 2-stage treatment. This study evaluates the results of metal-on-polyethylene articulating spacers for the treatment of chronic native septic knee arthritis. Methods: This is a retrospective review of 18 patients treated with metal-on-polyethylene articulating antibiotic spacers constructed with all-polyethylene tibial components or with polyethylene inserts (PIs) with Steinmann pins or screws for chronic native knee infection. Demographic information, spacer construct type, prior knee surgery, complications, infecting organisms, infection eradication, and functional results were analyzed. Results: Of 18, 8 (44%) spacers were all-polyethylene tibial components and 10 (56%) were PI. Of 18 patients, 5 (28%) experienced spacer complications. Of 18 patients, 12 (67%) underwent a second reimplantation surgery (mean 106 days), while 6 (33%) retained their spacer (average duration 425 days). The PI group performed better in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome score for Joint Replacement according to minimum clinically important difference and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) criteria. The overall reimplantation group achieved Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome score for Joint Replacement PASS criteria and minimum clinically important difference criteria, while the maintained articulating spacer group did not achieve PASS criteria; however, they did reach minimum clinically important difference. Conclusions: Functional articulating spacers are a viable treatment for chronic, native knee septic arthritis. The PI patient group had a greater improvement in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome score for Joint Replacement scores and had no significant difference in reimplantation rate as the all-polyethylene tibial components patient group. Both planned 2-stage reimplantation and longer-term spacer retention show promising results for this difficult clinical problem.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.