Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39071790›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2024

Jignesh Italiya, Ketankumar J Panchal, Subhash J Jakhesara, Chaitanya G Joshi, Prakash G Koringa

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jignesh ItaliyaDepartment of Veterinary Biotechnology, Veterinary College, Kamdhenu University, Anand, India.
Ketankumar J PanchalP. D. Patel Institute of Applied Sciences, Charotar University of Science and Technology, Changa, India.
Subhash J JakhesaraDepartment of Veterinary Biotechnology, Veterinary College, Kamdhenu University, Anand, India.
Chaitanya G JoshiDepartment of Science and Technology, Gujarat Biotechnology Research Centre (GBRC), Government of Gujarat, Gandhinagar, India.
Prakash G KoringaDepartment of Veterinary Biotechnology, Veterinary College, Kamdhenu University, Anand, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim/objectives: This study examines the Material method: For this study, one Gir bull was selected, and 12 ejaculates were collected at one-week time intervals. Sperm cells were isolated from each ejaculate and incubated with varying concentrations of the ethanolic extract. The physiological parameters of the spermatozoa were assessed using Computer Assisted Semen Analysis (CASA) and compared with control groups to evaluate the extract's effects on sperm quality and motility. Results and discussion: At a concentration of 18 mg/mL

Indexed as

Bryonia laciniosabull spermatozoaCASAShivlingitranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID39071790
PMCPMC11273328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.