Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39071749›Full record

ReviewMedical journal, Armed Forces India

Effectiveness of vestibular incision subperiosteal tunnel access technique: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Saravanan Sampoornam Pape Reddy, Delfin Lovelina Francis, Ruchi Harish, Kumara Raja, Shreehari Ambika Krishnan, Sukhbir Singh Chopra, Balaji Manohar, Ravikiran Narayana, Kesavalu Lakshmyya

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medical journal, Armed Forces India. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Saravanan Sampoornam Pape ReddyClassified Specialist (Periodontology), Army Dental Centre (Research & Referral), New Delhi, India.
Delfin Lovelina FrancisProfessor (Public Health Dentistry), Saveetha Dental College & Hospitals, Saveetha University, SIMATS, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Ruchi HarishGraded Specialist (Periodontology), Army Dental Centre (Research & Referral), New Delhi, India.
Kumara RajaAssociate Professor (Public Health Dentistry), Tagore Dental College & Hospitals, Rathinamangalam, Tamil Nadu, India.
Shreehari Ambika KrishnanProfessor & Head (Periodontology), Army Dental Centre (Research & Referral), New Delhi, India.
Sukhbir Singh ChopraCommandant, Army Dental Centre (Research & Referral), New Delhi, India.
Balaji ManoharProfessor & PG/PhD Guide (Periodontology), Kalinga Institute of Dental Sciences, KIIT Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Ravikiran NarayanaProfessor & Head (Periodontology), Darshan Dental College & Hospitals, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India.
Kesavalu LakshmyyaProfessor, University of Florida Term Professor, Adjunct Professor of Oral Biology, Member, College of Dentistry, Center for Translational Research in Neurodegenerative Diseases, College of Medicine, Florida University, Gainesville, FL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vestibular Incision Subperiosteal Tunnel Access (VISTA) root coverage technique has experienced a surge in popularity in recent times. The methodology employed in this study is characterized by its minimally invasive nature, utilizing a single incision. The primary objective of this systematic review was to assess the effectiveness of the VISTA approach for achieving root coverage. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO and included randomized controlled clinical trials where gingival recessions were managed with VISTA technique or its modifications. Among the total of 416 records, a mere 14 studies were initially deemed eligible for consideration. Ultimately, only eight pieces of research were included in the final analysis. There were six studies that exhibited heterogeneity, while two studies showed homogeneity and were therefore included in the meta-analysis. All of the studies considered in the analysis exhibited a moderate to low risk of bias. The majority of the research included in the analysis focused on selective root coverage outcome indicators, while neglecting to incorporate patient-reported outcome measures and patient experienced outcome measures. The VISTA procedure is commonly acknowledged as the most efficacious approach for managing gingival recession. The current literature provides support for the recommendation of the procedure, with evidence of intermediate certainty. The findings of this systematic review indicates that the available data are restricted due to several methodological limitations observed in the included studies. These limitations include, small sample sizes, selective reporting of outcomes, and very short follow-up periods.

Indexed as

Gingival recessionMinimally invasive surgical proceduresPatient reported outcome measuresSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID39071749
PMCPMC11279769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.