ArticleHeliyon2024
Machine learning-based model to predict severe acute kidney injury after total aortic arch replacement for acute type A aortic dissection.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Machine learning for the prediction of acute kidney injury post cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Pooled it
- Machine learning prediction of postoperative acute kidney injury in aortic dissection patients using dynamic inflammatory markers and clinical features.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Bridging macro bibliometrics and micro molecular mechanisms: an integrated analysis of global aortic dissection research.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Machine learning approaches for risk prediction in aortic dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Applications of Artificial Intelligence as a Prognostic Tool in the Management of Acute Aortic Syndrome and Aneurysm: A Comprehensive Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Review
- PREDICTORS AND OUTCOMES OF ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY IN INTRACEREBRAL HEMORRHAGE PATIENTS: EVIDENCE FROM A LARGE-SCALE NATIONAL DATABASE ANALYSIS.Shock (Augusta, Ga.) · 2025Article
- Calpain inhibition as a novel therapeutic strategy for aortic dissection with acute lower extremity ischemia.Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Severe acute kidney injury (AKI) after total aortic arch replacement (TAAR) is related to adverse outcomes in patients with acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD). However, the early prediction of severe AKI remains a challenge. This study aimed to develop a novel model to predict severe AKI after TAAR in ATAAD patients using machine learning algorithms. Methods: A total of 572 ATAAD patients undergoing TAAR were enrolled in this retrospective study, and randomly divided into a training set (70 %) and a validation set (30 %). Lasso regression, support vector machine-recursive feature elimination and random forest algorithms were used to screen indicators for severe AKI (defined as AKI stage III) in the training set, respectively. Then the intersection indicators were selected to construct models through artificial neural network (ANN) and logistic regression. The AUC-ROC curve was employed to ascertain the prediction efficacy of the ANN and logistic regression models. Results: The incidence of severe AKI after TAAR was 22.9 % among ATAAD patients. The intersection predictors identified by different machine learning algorithms were baseline serum creatinine and ICU admission variables, including serum cystatin C, procalcitonin, aspartate transaminase, platelet, lactic dehydrogenase, urine N-acetyl-β-d-glucosidase and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score. The ANN model showed a higher AUC-ROC than logistic regression (0.938 vs 0.908, p < 0.05). Furthermore, the ANN model could predict 89.1 % of severe AKI cases beforehand. In the validation set, the superior performance of the ANN model was further confirmed in terms of discrimination ability (AUC = 0.916), calibration curve analysis and decision curve analysis. Conclusion: This study developed a novel and reliable clinical prediction model for severe AKI after TAAR in ATAAD patients using machine learning algorithms. Importantly, the ANN model showed a higher predictive ability for severe AKI than logistic regression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.