ArticleHeliyon2024
Wildlife habitat suitability analysis and mapping the former dhidhessa wildlife sanctuary using GIS-based analytical hierarchal process and weighted linear combination methods.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-Scale Habitat Suitability and Spatial Distribution of the European Green Toad.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Management of wildlife populations and the creation of conservation programs depend on the evaluation of wildlife habitats. Habitat suitability mapping is a technique typically used to map appropriate environmental factors and assess species existence in different areas. This study aims to map wildlife habitat suitability sites in Former Dhidhessa wildlife sanctuary, Ethiopia, using GIS-based Analytical Hierarchal Process and Weighted Linear Combination Methods. This study used both primary and secondary data sources. Datasets used to collect data include Digital Elevation Model (DEM), Landsat 9 (OLI/TIRS) and population data. Beside, large mammalian species occurrence data obtained from field survey was used. To map wildlife habitat suitability sites in Former Dhidhessa wildlife sanctuary, environmental factors such as proximity of road network, distance to surface water, land use land cover types, slope, population density and topography were used with the integration of species occurrence data recorded from the study area. These environmental factors scaled to common ranges, and assigned appropriate weights. The quantile classification method was utilized to classify suitability index into five zones (unsuitable, less suitable, moderately suitable, suitable, and highly suitable) to produce the map. Accordingly, the model revealed that 18.9 % of the study area is highly suitable, 19.5 % is suitable, 19.9 % is moderately suitable, 19.5 % is less suitable, and 22.2 % is unsuitable for wildlife. About 58.3 % of the study area is currently identified as suitable for wildlife whereas 41.7 % is unsuitable. This showed that the former Dhidhessa wildlife sanctuary is still having large suitable habitats that can support wide ranges of wildlife. Hence, based on the developed preliminary habitat suitability indices and maps, the federal and local governments shall reevaluate the status of former Dhidhessa wildlife sanctuary and develop future conservation and management plans to enhance the conservation of wildlife and their habitats in the area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.