ArticleHeliyon2024
Deep learning for predicting fibrotic progression risk in diabetic individuals with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease initially free of hepatic fibrosis.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Harnessing artificial intelligence for the assessment of liver fibrosis and steatosisWorld journal of gastroenterology · 2026Review
- Multi-site, multi-vendor development and validation of a deep learning model for liver stiffness prediction using abdominal biparametric MRI.European radiology · 2025Article
- Advancements in Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Imaging Diagnostics for the Management of Liver Disease-Applications and Challenges in Personalized Care.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) significantly impacts patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), where current non-invasive assessment methods show limited predictive power for future fibrotic progression. This study aims to develop an enhanced deep learning (DL) model that integrates ultrasound elastography images with clinical data, refining the prediction of fibrotic progression in T2DM patients with MASLD who initially exhibit no signs of hepatic fibrosis. Methods: We enrolled 946 diabetic MASLD patients without advanced fibrosis, confirmed by initial liver stiffness measurements (LSM) below 6.5 kPa. Patients were divided into a training dataset of 671 and a testing dataset of 275. Hepatic shear wave elastography (SWE) images measured liver stiffness, classifying participants based on progression. A DL integrated model (DI-model) combining SWE images and clinical data was trained and its predictive performance compared with individual Image and Tabular models, as well as a logistic regression model on the testing dataset. Results: Fibrotic progression was observed in 18.1 % of patients over three years. During the training phase, the DI-model outperformed other models, achieving the lowest validation loss of 0.161 and highest accuracy of 0.933 through cross-validation. In the testing phase, it demonstrated robust discrimination with AUCs of 0.884 and 0.903 for the receiver operating characteristic and precision-recall curves, respectively, clearly outperforming other models. Shapley analysis identified BMI, LSM, and glycated hemoglobin as critical predictors. Conclusion: The DI-model significantly enhances the prediction of future fibrotic progression in diabetic MASLD patients, demonstrating the benefit of combining clinical and imaging data for early diagnosis and intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.