Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39071611›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

A method for cabbage root posture recognition based on YOLOv5s.

Fen Qiu, Chaofan Shao, Cheng Zhou, Lili Yao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fen QiuHuzhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Huzhou, 313000, Zhejiang, China.
Chaofan ShaoSchool of Information Engineering, Huzhou University, 313000, Zhejiang, China.
Cheng ZhouSchool of Information Engineering, Huzhou University, 313000, Zhejiang, China.
Lili YaoSchool of Information Engineering, Huzhou University, 313000, Zhejiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Efficient, non-destructive cabbage harvesting is crucial for preserving its flavor and quality. Current cabbage harvesting mainly relies on mechanized automatic picking methods. However, a notable deficiency in most existing cabbage harvesting devices is the absence of a root posture recognition system to promptly adjust the root posture, consequently impacting the accuracy of root cutting during harvesting. To address this issue, this study introduces a cabbage root posture recognition method that combines deep learning with traditional image processing algorithms. Preliminary detection of the main root Region of Interest (ROI) areas of the cabbage is carried out through the YOLOv5s deep learning model. Subsequently, traditional image processing methods, the Graham algorithm, and the method of calculating the minimum circumscribed rectangle are employed to specifically detect the inclination angle of cabbage roots. This approach effectively addresses the difficulty in calculating the inclination angle of roots caused by occlusion from outer leaves. The results demonstrate that the precision and recall of this method are 98.7 % and 98.6 %, respectively, with an average absolute error of 0.80° and an average relative error of 1.34 % in posture. Using this method as a reference for mechanical harvesting can effectively mitigate cabbage damage rates.

Indexed as

00001111Cabbage rootInclination recognitionMachine visionObject detection

Identifiers

PMID39071611
PMCPMC11282938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.