ReviewHeliyon2024
Significance and considerations of establishing standardized critical values for critical size defects in animal models of bone tissue regeneration.
Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Berberine-Loaded Mesoporous Bioactive Glass Enhances Bone Repair through Combined Immunomodulatory and Osteogenic Effects.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Synchronizing degradation with regeneration: a model-driven framework for designing biodegradable biomaterials in bone tissue engineering.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2026Review
- 3D printed porous tantalum loaded with quercetin-curcumin-piperine PLGA nanoparticles for bone defect repair.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Membrane-free bone regeneration using biphasic calcium phosphate, heterologous fibrin biopolymer, and photobiomodulation: anThe journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases · 2026Article
- Advancing the 3Rs in bone tissue engineering: emergingFrontiers in physiology · 2026Review
- Engineered 3D mesenchymal stem cell aggregates with multifunctional prowess for bone regeneration: Current status and future prospects.Journal of advanced research · 2026Review
- Synergistic Effect of Poly(ethylenephosphoric Acid) and Cerium in Bone Substitute Composites on Tissue Response and Bone Remodeling.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Functionalized mesenchymal stem cells for enhanced bone regeneration: advances and challenges.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Review
- Bibliometric analysis of hydrogels in bone regeneration: Research trends and future perspectives.Regenerative therapy · 2025Article
- Article
- Milestones in Mandibular Bone Tissue Engineering: A Systematic Review of Large Animal Models and Critical-Sized Defects.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Functionalized metal-organic framework and MOF-derived materials for bone regeneration applications.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Synthetic sticky bone grafts enhance bone regeneration: a preclinical evaluation in rat models.Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB · 2025Article
- Histomorphometric Assessment of Non-Decalcified Plastic-Embedded Specimens for Evaluation of Bone Regeneration Using Bone Substitute Materials-A Systematic Review.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Effect of nHA/CS/PLGA delivering adipose stem cell-derived exosomes and bone marrow stem cells on bone healing-in vitro and in vivo studies.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Establishing rabbit critical-size bone defects to evaluate the bone-regeneration potential of porous calcium phosphate ceramics.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Establishing animal models with critical size defects (CSDs) is critical for conducting experimental investigations engineering of bone tissue regeneration. Currently, a standardised protocol for establishing an animal CSDs model has not been developed. Furthermore, a consensus has not been reached regarding the critical values of CSDs. Successful establishment of animal models for CSDs is a complex process that requires researchers to meticulously consider a variety of factors such as age, species, bone defect size and anatomic location. The specific numerical values for CSDs in small animal models vary, and a clear definition of the critical value for large animal CSDs models in the literature is still lacking. This review consolidates the advancements in critical bone defects animal models by outlining the research landscape across variables, including animal species, age groups, bone defect sites, and sizes, to offer valuable guidance and a theoretical framework for the establishment of pertinent experimental animal models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.