Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39071546›Full record

Trial reportNature and science of sleep2024

Performance Investigation of Somfit Sleep Staging Algorithm.

Marcus McMahon, Jeremy Goldin, Elizabeth Susan Kealy, Darrel Joseph Wicks, Eugene Zilberg, Warwick Freeman, Behzad Aliahmad

Abstract readCase ReportsClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nature and science of sleep, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marcus McMahonDepartment of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Epworth Hospital, Richmond, Victoria, Australia and Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.
Jeremy GoldinDepartment of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkvile, Victoria, Australia.
Elizabeth Susan KealySleepmetrics Pty Ltd, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.
Darrel Joseph WicksSleep Disorders Unit, Epworth Hospital, Richmond, Victoria, Australia.
Eugene ZilbergMedical Innovations, Compumedics Limited, Abbotsford, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0009-0002-9062-7562
Warwick FreemanMedical Innovations, Compumedics Limited, Abbotsford, Victoria, Australia.
Behzad AliahmadMedical Innovations, Compumedics Limited, Abbotsford, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5671-4913

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate accuracy of the sleep staging algorithm in a new miniaturized home sleep monitoring device - Compumedics® Somfit. Somfit is attached to patient's forehead and combines channels specified for a pulse arterial tonometry (PAT)-based home sleep apnea testing (HSAT) device with the neurological signals. Somfit sleep staging deep learning algorithm is based on convolutional neural network architecture. Patients and Methods: One hundred and ten participants referred for sleep investigation with suspected or preexisting obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in need of a review were enrolled into the study involving simultaneous recording of full overnight polysomnography (PSG) and Somfit data. The recordings were conducted at three centers in Australia. The reported statistics include standard measures of agreement between Somfit automatic hypnogram and consensus PSG hypnogram. Results: Overall percent agreement across five sleep stages (N1, N2, N3, REM, and wake) between Somfit automatic and consensus PSG hypnograms was 76.14 (SE: 0.79). The percent agreements between different pairs of sleep technologists' PSG hypnograms varied from 74.36 (1.93) to 85.50 (0.64), with interscorer agreement being greater for scorers from the same sleep laboratory. The estimate of kappa between Somfit and consensus PSG was 0.672 (0.002). Percent agreement for sleep/wake discrimination was 89.30 (0.37). The accuracy of Somfit sleep staging algorithm varied with increasing OSA severity - percent agreement was 79.67 (1.87) for the normal subjects, 77.38 (1.06) for mild OSA, 74.83 (1.79) for moderate OSA and 72.93 (1.68) for severe OSA. Conclusion: Agreement between Somfit and PSG hypnograms was non-inferior to PSG interscorer agreement for a number of scorers, thus confirming acceptability of electrode placement at the center of the forehead. The directions for algorithm improvement include additional arousal detection, integration of motion and oximetry signals and separate inference models for individual sleep stages.

Indexed as

deep learningforehead electroencephalographyhome sleep apnea testinginterscorer agreementpolysomnography

Identifiers

PMID39071546
PMCPMC11277903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.