ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
A Cost-effective, High-throughput, Highly Accurate Genotyping Method for Outbred Populations.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Affordable sequencing and genotyping methods are essential for large scale genome-wide association studies. While genotyping microarrays and reference panels for imputation are available for human subjects, non-human model systems often lack such options. Our lab previously demonstrated an efficient and cost-effective method to genotype heterogeneous stock rats using double-digest genotyping-by-sequencing. However, low-coverage whole-genome sequencing offers an alternative method that has several advantages. Here, we describe a cost-effective, high-throughput, high-accuracy genotyping method for N/NIH heterogeneous stock rats that can use a combination of sequencing data previously generated by double-digest genotyping-by-sequencing and more recently generated by low-coverage whole-genome-sequencing data. Using double-digest genotyping-by-sequencing data from 5,745 heterogeneous stock rats (mean 0.21x coverage) and low-coverage whole-genome-sequencing data from 8,760 heterogeneous stock rats (mean 0.27x coverage), we can impute 7.32 million bi-allelic single-nucleotide polymorphisms with a concordance rate >99.76% compared to high-coverage (mean 33.26x coverage) whole-genome sequencing data for a subset of the same individuals. Our results demonstrate the feasibility of using sequencing data from double-digest genotyping-by-sequencing or low-coverage whole-genome-sequencing for accurate genotyping, and demonstrate techniques that may also be useful for other genetic studies in non-human subjects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.