ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
AoUPRS: A Cost-Effective and Versatile PRS Calculator for the
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The All of Us (AoU) Research Program provides a comprehensive genomic dataset to accelerate health research and medical breakthroughs. Despite its potential, researchers face significant challenges, including high costs and inefficiencies associated with data extraction and analysis. AoUPRS addresses these challenges by offering a versatile and cost-effective tool for calculating polygenic risk scores (PRS), enabling both experienced and novice researchers to leverage the AoU dataset for significant genomic discoveries. Results: AoUPRS is implemented in Python and utilizes the Hail framework for genomic data analysis. It offers two distinct approaches for PRS calculation: the Hail MatrixTable (MT) and the Hail Variant Dataset (VDS). The MT approach provides a dense representation of genotype data, while the VDS approach offers a sparse representation, significantly reducing computational costs. In performance evaluations, the VDS approach demonstrated a cost reduction of up to 99.51% for smaller scores and 85% for larger scores compared to the MT approach. Both approaches yielded similar predictive power, as shown by logistic regression analyses of PRS for coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation, and type 2 diabetes. The empirical cumulative distribution functions (ECDFs) for PRS values further confirmed the consistency between the two methods. Conclusions: AoUPRS is a versatile and cost-effective tool that addresses the high costs and inefficiencies associated with PRS calculations using the AoU dataset. By offering both dense and sparse data processing approaches, AoUPRS allows researchers to choose the approach best suited to their needs, facilitating genomic discoveries. The tool's open-source availability on GitHub, coupled with detailed documentation and tutorials, ensures accessibility and ease of use for the scientific community.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.