Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39071158›Full record

ReviewPhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2024

A systematic review of 4D magnetic resonance imaging techniques for abdominal radiotherapy treatment planning.

Lamyaa Aljaafari, David Bird, David L Buckley, Bashar Al-Qaisieh, Richard Speight

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Multi-contrast 4DMR via MR multitasking: Early clinical experience and implication for liver stereotactic body radiation therapy.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lamyaa AljaafariLeeds Institute of Cardiovascular & Metabolic Medicine (LICAMM), University of Leeds, Woodhouse, Leeds, LS2 9JT, United Kingdom.
David BirdDepartment of Medical Physics and Engineering, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, LS9 7TF, United Kingdom.
David L BuckleyLeeds Institute of Cardiovascular & Metabolic Medicine (LICAMM), University of Leeds, Woodhouse, Leeds, LS2 9JT, United Kingdom.
Bashar Al-QaisiehDepartment of Medical Physics and Engineering, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, LS9 7TF, United Kingdom.
Richard SpeightDepartment of Medical Physics and Engineering, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, LS9 7TF, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and purpose: Four-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (4DMRI) has gained interest as an alternative to the current standard for motion management four-dimensional tomography (4DCT) in abdominal radiotherapy treatment planning (RTP). This review aims to assess the 4DMRI literature in abdomen, focusing on technical considerations and the validity of using 4DMRI for patients within radiotherapy protocols. Materials and methods: The review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A comprehensive search was performed across the Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, covering all years up to December 31, 2023. The studies were grouped into two categories: 4DMRI reconstructed from 3DMRI acquisition; and 4DMRI reconstructed from multi-slice 2DMRI acquisition. Results: A total of 39 studies met the inclusion criteria and were analysed to provide key findings. Key findings were 4DMRI had the potential to improve abdominal RTP for patients by providing accurate tumour definition and motion assessment compared to 4DCT. 4DMRI reconstructed from 3DMRI acquisition showed promise as a feasible approach for motion management in abdominal RTP regarding spatial resolution. Currently,the slice thickness achieved on 4DMRI reconstructed from multi-slice 2DMRI acquisitions was unsuitable for clinical purposes. Lastly, the current barriers for clinical implementation of 4DMRI were the limited availability of validated commercial solutions and the lack of larger cohort comparative studies to 4DCT for target delineation and plan optimisation. Conclusion: 4DMRI showed potential improvements in abdominal RTP, but standards and guidelines for the use of 4DMRI in radiotherapy were required to demonstrate clinical benefits.

Indexed as

Abdominal radiotherapy treatment planningFour-dimensional computed tomographyFour-dimensional magnetic resonance imagingMotion management

Identifiers

PMID39071158
PMCPMC11283022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.