ArticleNational science review2024
Distinct SARS-CoV-2 populational immune backgrounds tolerate divergent RBD evolutionary preferences.
Article in National science review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of prolonged infection on SARS-CoV-2 evolution.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Characterization of the heterogeneity in SARS-CoV-2 fitness dynamics via graph representation learning.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- In silico genomic surveillance by CoVerage predicts and characterizes SARS-CoV-2 variants of interest.Nature communications · 2025Article
- SARS-CoV-2 keeps evolving, so must our research efforts.National science review · 2025Article
- Surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 variants in Henan, China from 2023 to 2024.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immune evasion is a pivotal force shaping the evolution of viruses. Nonetheless, the extent to which virus evolution varies among populations with diverse immune backgrounds remains an unsolved mystery. Prior to the widespread SARS-CoV-2 infections in December 2022 and January 2023, the Chinese population possessed a markedly distinct (less potent) immune background due to its low infection rate, compared to countries experiencing multiple infection waves, presenting an unprecedented opportunity to investigate how the virus has evolved under different immune contexts. We compared the mutation spectrum and functional potential of the newly derived mutations that occurred in BA.5.2.48, BF.7.14 and BA.5.2.49-variants prevalent in China-with their counterparts in other countries. We found that the emerging mutations in the receptor-binding-domain region in these lineages were more widely dispersed and evenly distributed across different epitopes. These mutations led to a higher angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) binding affinity and reduced potential for immune evasion compared to their counterparts in other countries. These findings suggest a milder immune pressure and less evident immune imprinting within the Chinese population. Despite the emergence of numerous immune-evading variants in China, none of them outcompeted the original strain until the arrival of the XBB variant, which had stronger immune evasion and subsequently outcompeted all circulating variants. Our findings demonstrated that the continuously changing immune background led to varying evolutionary pressures on SARS-CoV-2. Thus, in addition to viral genome surveillance, immune background surveillance is also imperative for predicting forthcoming mutations and understanding how these variants spread in the population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.