ReviewCureus2024
Nutritional Ketosis as a Therapeutic Approach in Critical Illness: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Critical illness encompasses the dysfunction of vital organs, the risk of death, and potential reversibility; it is a major cause of morbidity and mortality globally. The pathophysiology underlying many critical illnesses includes bioenergetic failure, inflammation, and oxidative stress. This systematic review aims to explore the use of nutritional ketosis (ketogenic feeds and exogenous ketone body administration) as a potential therapy, affecting the aforementioned pathways in patients with critical illnesses. This study was conducted, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. The search was conducted, systematically using PubMed, PubMed Central (PMC), Google Scholar, and the ScienceDirect databases in February 2024. The inclusion criteria were set to free full-text articles published within the past five years: human and animal studies, literature reviews, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, observational studies, randomized controlled trials, case reports, book chapters, gray literature, studies investigating adult samples, and articles in the English language. Exclusion criteria included pediatric studies as the topic has been studied more extensively in children, and this review aims to explore potential benefits in adult patients. The search was conducted through four databases; after the screening process, the remaining studies were assessed through quality appraisal tools appropriate to each study type. In the end, 11 studies were selected, including eight narrative reviews, one cohort study, one animal study, and one randomized controlled trial. The results of this review demonstrated that nutritional ketosis has potential safe and effective benefits for humans and animals. Nutritional ketosis shows therapeutic benefits for a vast variety of complications commonly associated with critical illness, status epilepticus, sepsis, viral infections, and glycemic control. In the end, both randomized and nonrandomized clinical trials are necessary for more conclusive findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.