ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2024
The role of ICDS services on early childhood development: A cross-sectional study in Hyderabad, Telangana.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Integrated child development services (ICDS) include supplementary nutrition, nutrition and health education, health check-ups, immunization, preschool education, and referral services targeted at beneficiaries including pregnant and lactating mothers, children below six years, and women of reproductive age. Specific interventions are implemented to support children for a higher developmental outcome. Objectives: The aims of this study are (1) to compare the development of ICDS beneficiaries in the age group of 4-6 years with the dropouts, (2) to assess caregiver practices among mothers of beneficiaries and the dropouts, and (3) to understand the perceptions of Anganwadi workers (AWWs) on early child development (ECD) and ICDS services. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted for two months in select Anganwadi centers (AWCs) of Hyderabad. AWCs were selected through multi-stage sampling. Respondents included 114 mothers and five AWWs. Quantitative data was collected by a questionnaire and qualitative data through an interview guide. Proportions were estimated for description. STATA 14.0 was used to find out correlates of development in children through unpaired Results: About 68.42% and 33.33% of children from the beneficiary group were found to show normal cognitive and emotional development when compared to the dropout group (59.65% and 21.05%, respectively). KAP assessment revealed no significant difference between the mothers of dropouts and beneficiaries. Lack of infrastructure and poor attention to preschool activities were identified as reasons for dropout. Conclusion: Improving infrastructure, capacity building of AWWs, and reducing their workload will help in focusing on ECD-related activities at ICDS centers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.