Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39070977›Full record

ArticleAsiaIntervention2024

RAdiation Dose Attenuation using RADPAD in CATH lab for primary and secondary operators - RADAR-CATH STUDY.

Sandeepan Saha, Aditya Kapoor, Kamlesh Raut, Arpita Katheria, Harshit Khare, Ankit Sahu, Roopali Khanna, Sudeep Kumar, Naveen Garg, Satyendra Tewari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AsiaIntervention, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sandeepan SahaDepartment of Cardiology, Sanjay Gandhi PGIMS, Lucknow, India.
Aditya KapoorDepartment of Cardiology, Sanjay Gandhi PGIMS, Lucknow, India.
Kamlesh RautDepartment of Cardiology, Sanjay Gandhi PGIMS, Lucknow, India.
Arpita KatheriaDepartment of Cardiology, Sanjay Gandhi PGIMS, Lucknow, India.
Harshit KhareDepartment of Cardiology, Sanjay Gandhi PGIMS, Lucknow, India.
Ankit SahuDepartment of Cardiology, Sanjay Gandhi PGIMS, Lucknow, India.
Roopali KhannaDepartment of Cardiology, Sanjay Gandhi PGIMS, Lucknow, India.
Sudeep KumarDepartment of Cardiology, Sanjay Gandhi PGIMS, Lucknow, India.
Naveen GargDepartment of Cardiology, Sanjay Gandhi PGIMS, Lucknow, India.
Satyendra TewariDepartment of Cardiology, Sanjay Gandhi PGIMS, Lucknow, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Radiation injury is an important concern for interventional cardiologists and needs to be addressed. RADPAD is a radiation protection drape that has been shown to reduce the radiation exposure of the primary operator (PO). While Indian data on radiation exposure of the PO in the cath lab are scarce, the exposure of the secondary operator (SO) is even less well studied. Aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of RADPAD drapes in reducing radiation doses in the cath lab for the primary as well as the secondary operator. Methods: A total of 160 patients (40 patients each with single vessel disease [SVD], double vessel disease [DVD] and triple vessel disease [TVD] undergoing coronary angioplasty, and 40 patients undergoing balloon mitral valvuloplasty [BMV]) were randomised in a 1:1 pattern to undergo a procedure with or without the use of RADPAD. Results: For patients with SVD, DVD and TVD undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and those undergoing BMV, the % reduction with the use of RADPAD reduced the PO's received dose (in mrem) by 65%, 54%, 28% and 67%, respectively, as compared to without RADPAD. The % reduction in relative operator exposure for the PO for the 4 groups was 55%, 34%, 18% and 75%, respectively, with the use of RADPAD. The corresponding % reduction for the SO's received dose (in mrem) was 80%, 63%, 33% and 69% and for relative operator exposure was 74%, 46%, 23% and 76% in the 4 groups, respectively. Conclusions: RADPAD significantly reduces the radiation exposure of the primary and secondary operator during prolonged complex PCI and BMV procedures.

Identifiers

PMID39070977
PMCPMC11261659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.