ArticleAsiaIntervention2024
Angiographic patterns after drug-coated balloon angioplasty for de novo coronary lesions.
Article in AsiaIntervention, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Drug-coated balloon angioplasty for coronary de novo lesions - hype or hope?AsiaIntervention · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty has emerged as an effective treatment option for Aims: The aim of the present study was to evaluate chronic-phase angiographic classification after DCB angioplasty. Methods: This was a single-centre, retrospective, observational study. From June 2016 to August 2022, 708 lesions (670 patients) underwent DCB angioplasty for Results: Of the 337 lesions analysed, 91.1% (n=307) were in the non-restenosis group, and 8.9% (n=30) were in the restenosis group. The non-restenosis group was classified into non-restenosis (45.1%; n=152) and lumen enlargement (46.0%; n=155). The restenosis group was classified into focal restenosis (5.0%; n=17), diffuse restenosis (3.6%; n=12), and occlusive restenosis (0.3%; n=1). There were no aneurysms, and plaque cavities were often observed (8.0%). During the chronic phase, residual dissection was seen in only one case (0.3%). Conclusions: This report demonstrates for the first time the angiographic classification after DCB angioplasty for
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.