ArticlePalliative medicine reports2024
Appropriate Timing of End-of-Life Care: A Dutch Policy Analysis and Opportunities for Improvement.
Article in Palliative medicine reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The Exceptional Medical Expenses Act (EMEA) guaranteed public financing for the costs of end-of-life care in The Netherlands until 2015. A life expectancy shorter than three months was a prerequisite for a patient to qualify. Objective: To estimate survival and its potential predictors using the start date of EMEA funded end-of-life care as time origin, and to calculate the ensuing costs. Design: Retrospective observational study using data retrieved from multiple datasets of the national statistical office Statistics Netherlands (https://www.cbs.nl/en-gb/). Setting: Included were all adult patients, who received EMEA funded end-of-life care in hospice units in nursing homes and homes for the elderly in The Netherlands between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2014. Results: In 40,659 patients (median age 79 years), the distribution of survival was extremely skewed. Median, 95%, and maximum survival times were 15 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 15-15), 219 (210-226), and 2,006 days, respectively. The 90-day and 180-day survival rates were 12.4 (12.1-12.7)% and 6.2 (6.0-6.5)%, respectively. Although age, gender, diagnosis, and start year of end-of-life care were statistically significant independent predictors, clinical significance is limited. End-of-life care was delivered for a total of 1,720,002 days, costing almost 440 million Euros. Fifty-nine percent of the costs was for barely 11% of patients, i.e., those who received end-of-life care for more than 90 days. Conclusion: The use of life expectancy is a weak basis for the appropriate timing of end-of-life care. Further research should evaluate potential tools to improve the timing of end-of-life care, while using available resources efficiently.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.