ReviewCJC pediatric and congenital heart disease2024
The Ross Procedure in Children and Infants: A Systematic Review With Pooled Analyses.
Review in CJC pediatric and congenital heart disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Ross Procedure in Children with Congenital Heart Disease.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
- What Are SAVR Indications in the TAVI Era?Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- State-of-the-Art Review of Aortic Root Reconstruction: Contemporary Techniques and Challenges.Innovations (Philadelphia, Pa.)Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The Ross procedure is a surgical option for congenital aortic stenosis that involves replacing the diseased aortic valve with a pulmonary autograft. Little is known about outcomes in children, particularly those younger than 1 year. Methods: A systematic review with pooled analyses was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) criteria. Inferred individual patient data were extracted from life tables. The primary end points were early (≤30 days) and late (>30 days) mortality rates following the Ross procedure in children. Secondary end points were freedom from reintervention for the right ventricular outflow tract and pulmonary autograft. These end points were assessed in the overall population of children. Sensitivity analyses were performed in subgroups younger than 1 year of age (infants) and in noninfant children. Results: A total of 25 studies on 2737 patients met inclusion criteria. The pooled early survival rate was 96.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 95.1%-96.8%) overall and 86.8% (95% CI: 82.1%-90.3%) among infants. Pooled overall 10-year survival, freedom from pulmonary autograft reintervention, and freedom from right ventricular outflow tract reintervention rates were 91.1%, 90.2%, and 79.7%, respectively. Corresponding pooled rates in infants were 79.3%, 87.1%, and 51.2%. Mortality was significantly higher among infants compared with noninfant children (hazard ratio: 3.38, 95% CI: 2.44-4.68; Conclusions: Modest survival and autograft reoperation rates were observed following the Ross procedure in children. Surgery in infancy was strongly associated with poorer survival and higher reintervention rates.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.