ArticleVaccine: X2024
A cost benefit analysis of varicella vaccination in South Korea.
Article in Vaccine: X, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The introduction of varicella vaccination has significantly reduced the burden of chickenpox in many countries, but outbreaks still occur in populations with high vaccination coverage. To address this, some countries, including the United States, Germany, and Japan, have adopted a two-dose varicella vaccination recommendation. Economic evaluations are crucial for assessing vaccine recommendations; however, there are limited studies exist in Asian countries. Thus, our study aimed to evaluate the cost-benefit of one-dose and two-dose varicella vaccination programs compared to no vaccination in South Korea, incorporating updated data on disease burden and costs. Methods: We utilized data from South Korea's health databases to estimate varicella burden and vaccination records. Decision tree analysis was employed to compare costs and benefits of vaccination strategies over a ten-year period for the 2012 birth cohort. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the impact of various variables. Results: Both one-dose and two-dose vaccination programs showed cost-benefit compared to no vaccination, with substantial societal cost savings. The one-dose program yielded a benefit-cost ratio (BCR) of1.43, while the two-dose program had a direct BCR of1.28. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of these findings. Conclusion: Our study demonstrates the economic benefits of varicella vaccination in South Korea, aligning with findings from other countries. While the second dose did not show additional cost savings compared to the one-dose program, other factors like disease severity and transmission dynamics should be considered. Implementing either a one-dose or two-dose varicella vaccination regimen in South Korea could lead to cost reductions and improved cost-effectiveness compared to no vaccination, emphasizing the importance of vaccination programs in reducing disease burden and enhancing public health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.