Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39070901›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2024

Factors Affecting Choice of Surgical Treatment of Cartilage Lesions of the Knee: An Analysis of Data From 5143 Patients From the German Cartilage Registry (KnorpelRegister DGOU).

Sebastian Gebhardt, Marcus Vollmer, Alexander Zimmerer, Ingo Rochel, Peter Balcarek, Philipp Niemeyer, Georgi I Wassilew

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sebastian GebhardtCenter for Orthopaedics, Trauma Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9332-1927
Marcus VollmerInstitute of Bioinformatics, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Alexander ZimmererCenter for Orthopaedics, Trauma Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Ingo RochelKlinik für Unfallchirurgie, Handchirurgie und Orthopädie, KRH Klinikum Nordstadt, Hannover, Germany.
Peter BalcarekARCUS Sportklinik, Pforzheim, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9934-1766
Philipp NiemeyerOCM-Orthopädische Chirurgie München, München, Germany.
Georgi I WassilewCenter for Orthopaedics, Trauma Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Symptomatic full-thickness cartilage lesions of the knee joint are considered an indication for cartilage repair surgery. Patient- and lesion-specific factors like age, nutritional status, etiology of defect, or integrity of corresponding joint surface remain controversial in indicating cartilage repair surgery. Furthermore, the selection of the most suitable cartilage repair technique for a specific cartilage lesion remains debatable. Purpose: To evaluate indications and choice of treatment method for cartilage repair surgery, depending on patient- and lesion-specific data from the German Cartilage Registry. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 6305 consecutive patients who underwent cartilage repair surgery of the knee evaluated and 5143 complete datasets were included in the analysis (follow-up rate, 81.5%). Patient-specific (age, body mass index, smoking status, previous operations, clinical leg axis) and lesion-specific (size, grading, location, etiology) data were provided by the attending surgeon at the time of surgery. Appropriate statistical tests were used to compare data depending on type and normality of data. Multivariable logistic regressions were calculated to investigate independent factors for the choice of specific cartilage repair techniques. Results: The median size of treated cartilage lesions was 3.6 cm Conclusion: Cartilage repair surgery was indicated irrespective of nutritional status, smoking status, or etiology of the treated lesion. ACI was the most prevalent technique and was preferred for younger patients and patellar lesions. While older patients with degenerative changes to the joint were not excluded from cartilage repair surgery, the use of ACI was restricted.

Indexed as

articular cartilageclinical assessment/grading scalesDeutsches KnorpelRegister (DGOU)epidemiologyGerman Cartilage Registrykneestatistics

Identifiers

PMID39070901
PMCPMC11273558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.