ArticleDigital health
Exploratory analysis of swallowing behaviour in community-dwelling older adults using a wearable device: Differences by age and ingestant under different task loads.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Digital health technologies in swallowing care from screening to rehabilitation: A narrative review.Auris, nasus, larynx · 2025Review
- Current Technological Advances in Dysphagia Screening: Systematic Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To develop a new method of evaluating swallowing behaviour. Methods: Sixty-nine healthy participants were divided into a younger (16 males and 16 females, mean age 39.09 ± 12.16 years) and older (18 males and 19 females, mean age 71.43 ± 5.50 years) group. The participants ingested water and yoghurt twice (directed and free swallowing) at rest and after performing simple daily life tasks (calculation and exercise). To measure swallowing frequency, we employed a smartphone-based, portable and neck-worn swallowing-sound-monitoring device. This device monitors swallowing behaviour continuously by collecting biological sounds from the neck without imposing behavioural restrictions. A neural network model of swallowing sound identification by deep learning was used for the subsequent evaluation. This device was used to obtain two types of saliva-swallowing sounds associated with different ingestants, at rest and after performing a stimulating task. Furthermore, we assessed the associated subjective psychological states. Results: The younger group showed a higher directed swallowing frequency (for both water and yoghurt) than the older group did. Regarding the type of ingestant, the swallowing frequency for yoghurt was higher during free swallowing in both the young and the older groups. 'Feeling calm' was reported significantly more often in the older group after swallowing yoghurt following exercise. Conclusions: Swallowing status in daily life was measured non-invasively using a wearable mobile device. It is important to consider the type of ingestant, daily living activities, and age when assessing swallowing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.