ArticleDigital health
Experiences of rural clinicians accessing specialist support via telehealth for trauma and emergency care in Queensland, Australia.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Virtual Integrated General Practitioner-Pediatrician Model of Care Implemented in Metropolitan and Rural Primary Care Settings: Qualitative Analysis of Clinician Perspectives on the SUSTAIN Model of Care.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- From retrieval to recovery: a joint expert perspective on equity and trauma systems reform in regional Northern Queensland, Australia.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
- Conceptualising the impact of telehealth on rural workforce sustainability using system dynamics and the Gartner Hype Cycle.npj health systems · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Trauma and emergency patients presenting to rural facilities require time-critical treatment and management that is sometimes beyond the scope of clinicians in the facility. In Queensland, Australia's second largest state, telehealth infrastructure facilitates 24/7 communication between rural clinicians and tertiary-based critical care specialists. We sought to understand the current state of Queensland's emergency telehealth system from the perspective of direct end-users to inform future improvement efforts and resource allocation. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 rural Queensland clinicians who use telehealth to access specialist support during critical presentations. Qualitative data were analysed in three inductive phases: immersion; a combination of process coding and in vivo coding; and focused coding. Results: The findings highlight that emergency telehealth support provides benefits beyond better patient care, as it fosters collegiality and alleviates professional isolation. Three key themes were identified: (a) strategies for overcoming challenges in providing trauma and emergency care in rural Queensland; (b) factors that affect perceptions of telehealth effectiveness; and (c) how support for rural trauma and emergency care can be improved. To provide context for the themes, a summary of scene-setting data is also provided. Conclusions: There are both advantages and disadvantages for rural clinicians accessing telehealth specialist support for critical care. Although telehealth is seen as a vital service that supports rural clinicians and benefits patient care, the findings suggest that tools, systems and processes surrounding rural trauma and emergency care could benefit from streamlining, integration, and the introduction of fit-for-purpose technologies. Addressing limitations of efficiencies would improve support for rural clinicians and likely improve patient outcomes for rural communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.