ArticleWorld journal of clinical cases2024
Effects of vitrectomy combined with internal limiting membrane peeling in patients with diabetic macular edema.
Article in World journal of clinical cases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Outcome of pars plana vitrectomy with and without internal limiting membrane peeling in proliferative diabetic retinopathy.International ophthalmology · 2026Trial
- Preoperative OCT biomarkers and surgical outcomes after vitrectomy with epiretinal membrane and internal limiting membrane peeling for refractory diabetic macular edema: a retrospective cohort study.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDiabetic macular edema (DME), a chronic microvascular complication of diabetes, is a leading cause of visual impairment and blindness. Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) can restore the normal macular structure and reduce macular edema, whereas internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling is used to treat tractional macular diseases. Despite the advantages, there is limited research on the combined effects of PPV with ILM peeling.
aimTo observe the effects of PPV combined with ILM peeling on postoperative central macular thickness (CMT), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), cystoid macular edema (CME) volume, and complications in patients with DME.
methodsEighty-one patients (92 eyes) diagnosed with DME at the Beijing Shanqu Liangxiang Hospital between January and December 2022 were randomly divided to undergo PPV alone (control group: 41 patients, 47 eyes) or PPV + ILM peeling (stripping group: 40 patients, 45 eyes); a single surgeon performed all surgeries. The two groups were compared preoperatively and 1 and 3 months postoperatively.
resultsPreoperatively, both groups had comparable values of CMT, BCVA, and CME volume (
conclusionPPV with ILM peeling can significantly improve the visual acuity of patients with DME, reduce CMT, and improve CME with fewer complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.