Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39070836›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of clinical cases2024

Comparison of ovarian preservation versus oophorectomy on fertility outcomes in patients with endometriosis post-laparoscopic surgery: A prospective study.

Jin-Jin Zhou, Ke Yu, Hai-Yan Mao, Cen Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of clinical cases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jin-Jin ZhouDepartment of Gynecology, Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225001, Jiangsu Province, China.
Ke YuDepartment of Gynecology, Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225001, Jiangsu Province, China.
Hai-Yan MaoDepartment of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225001, Jiangsu Province, China.
Cen LiDepartment of Gynecology, Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225001, Jiangsu Province, China. licen86@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndometriosis is a chronic inflammatory condition affecting a significant proportion of women of reproductive age. Although laparoscopic surgery is commonly the preferred treatment, the decision to preserve or remove the ovaries remains controversial. Previous studies have yielded inconsistent results regarding the impact of ovarian preservation

aimTo compare the reproductive outcomes and recurrence rates between ovarian preservation and oophorectomy in women undergoing laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis.

methodsThis study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital between January 2019 and December 2023. A total of 312 women aged 18 to 40 years, diagnosed with endometriosis and undergoing laparoscopic surgery, were included. The patients were categorized into the ovarian preservation group (

resultsThe ovarian preservation group exhibited a significantly higher spontaneous pregnancy rate than that in the oophorectomy group (43.6%

conclusionOvarian preservation is associated with a high spontaneous pregnancy rate and a short time to pregnancy. However, because of the increased risk of recurrence, the decision should be based on age, fertility aspirations, and disease severity.

Indexed as

EndometriosisLaparoscopicOophorectomyOvarianPregnancySpontaneous pregnancy

Identifiers

PMID39070836
PMCPMC11235484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.