Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39070794›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2024

Is it time to recommend AUC-based vancomycin therapeutic drug monitoring only? A cross-sectional survey in China.

Jieqiong Liu, Xuan Zhang, Gang Liang, Jianping Zhu, Yi Yang, Ying Zheng, Yun Han, Lingyan Yu, Yuhua Zhao, Zhenwei Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Optimal vancomycin AUCEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jieqiong Liu *Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Xuan Zhang *Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Yangzhou, China.
Gang Liang *Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Jianping ZhuSir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Yi YangSir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Ying ZhengThe 903rd Hospital of PLA Joint Logistic Support Force, Hangzhou, China.
Yun HanSir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Lingyan YuResearch Center for Clinical Pharmacy, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Yuhua ZhaoAffiliated Xiaoshan Hospital, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China.
Zhenwei YuSir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The latest published therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) guidelines for vancomycin recommend changing trough-based monitoring to area under the concentration-to-time curve (AUC)-based monitoring. This study aimed to evaluate the implementation status and perceptions of vancomycin AUC-based TDM in China and to determine the challenges in performing AUC-based TDM. Methods: A nationwide cross-sectional survey was conducted in China using an online questionnaire. The questionnaire comprised a total of 25 questions with open- and closed-ended answers to collect information about the current implementation of vancomycin TDM and the participants' perceptions of these practices. The questionnaire responses were collected via the Questionnaire Star platform and analyzed. Results: A total of 161 questionnaires were completed by 131 hospitals and were included. Approximately 59.5% (78/131) of the surveyed hospitals conducted vancomycin TDM; however, only 10.7% (14/131) of these hospitals performed AUC-based vancomycin TDM. Of the eligible participants, 58.4% (94/161) had experience with vancomycin TDM, and only 37 participants (37/161, 23.0%) had the ability to estimate the AUC, primarily through Bayesian simulation (33/161, 20.5%). The participants considered the following challenges to implementing AUC-based monitoring: (1) the high cost of AUC-based monitoring; (2) inadequate knowledge among pharmacists and/or physicians; (3) the complexity of AUC calculations; (4) difficulty obtaining AUC software; and (5) unclear benefit of AUC-based monitoring. Conclusion: The majority of surveyed hospitals have not yet implemented AUC-based vancomycin TDM. Multiple challenges should be addressed before wide implementation of AUC-based monitoring, and guidance for trough-based monitoring is still needed.

Indexed as

area under the concentration-time curvesurveytherapeutic drug monitoringtrough concentrationvancomycin

Identifiers

PMID39070794
PMCPMC11272526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.