Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39070753›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Europe2024

Trends in vaping and smoking following the rise of disposable e-cigarettes: a repeat cross-sectional study in England between 2016 and 2023.

Harry Tattan-Birch, Jamie Brown, Lion Shahab, Emma Beard, Sarah E Jackson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Global Prevalence of Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of oral pathology & medicine : official publication of the International Association of Oral Pathologists and the American Academy of Oral Pathology · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Changes in harm perceptions of e-cigarettes compared with cigarettes following the announcement of the disposable vape ban in Great Britain.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Harry Tattan-BirchDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK.
Jamie BrownDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK.
Lion ShahabDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK.
Emma BeardDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK.
Sarah E JacksonDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There has been a rapid rise in disposable (single-use) e-cigarette vaping among young adults in England since June 2021 (leading to a planned ban on these products). We examined how this has affected population trends in current (i) vaping, (ii) tobacco smoking, and (iii) inhaled nicotine use. Methods: We used data from a nationally-representative monthly repeat cross-sectional survey of adults (≥18) in England (n = 132,252; July-2016-May-2023). Using interrupted time-series analyses (segmented logistic regression), we estimated yearly trends in current tobacco smoking, vaping, and inhaled nicotine use (smoking and/or vaping) before ('pre-disposables') and after June-2021 ('post-disposables'), stratified by age group (18 to 24, 25 to 44, 45 and over). We also examined trends in daily use and in vaping among never-smokers. Findings: Pre-disposables, vaping and smoking prevalence had been stable or declining across all age groups. However, post-disposables, the odds of current vaping increased by 99% per year among 18 to 24-year-olds (odds ratio [OR] = 1.99; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.71 to 2.31), compared with 39% (OR = 1.39; 95% CI = 1.26 to 1.52) in 25 to 44-year-olds and 23% (OR = 1.23; 95% CI = 1.12 to 1.35) in those aged 45 or older. Smoking rates continued to decline - albeit modestly - in 18 to 24-year-olds (OR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.77 to 1.00) and 25 to 44-year-olds (OR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.86 to 1.00), but increased among those aged 45 or older (OR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.05 to 1.20). As a result, post-disposables, the overall prevalence of inhaled nicotine use increased across all age groups. Trends were similar for daily use, but post-disposables increases in vaping were greatest among people who had never regularly smoked (e.g., 18 to 24-year-olds: OR = 2.50, 95% CI = 1.82 to 3.43). Interpretation: Since disposable vapes started becoming popular in England, historic declines in nicotine use have reversed. Now, nicotine use appears to be rising, driven primarily by sharp increases in vaping among young people. Smoking declines have been most pronounced in age groups with the largest increases in vaping. Funding: Cancer Research UK.

Indexed as

Electronic nicotine delivery systemsENDSSingle-useTobaccoVaping

Identifiers

PMID39070753
PMCPMC11281926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.