ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2024
Improving diffuse optical tomography imaging quality using APU-Net: an attention-based physical U-Net model.
Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine-learning-enhanced image reconstruction in optical tomography using the Monte Carlo method for light transport.Journal of biomedical optics · 2026Article
- Article
- Diffuse optical imaging with channel attention fusion network.Journal of biomedical optics · 2026Article
- DOT-AE-GAN: a hybrid autoencoder-GAN model for enhanced ultrasound-guided diffuse optical tomography reconstruction.Journal of biomedical optics · 2025Article
- Cherenkov light emission in external beam radiation therapy of the larynx.Journal of biomedical optics · 2025Article
- Towards real-time diffuse optical tomography with a handheld scanning probe.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Significance: Traditional diffuse optical tomography (DOT) reconstructions are hampered by image artifacts arising from factors such as DOT sources being closer to shallow lesions, poor optode-tissue coupling, tissue heterogeneity, and large high-contrast lesions lacking information in deeper regions (known as shadowing effect). Addressing these challenges is crucial for improving the quality of DOT images and obtaining robust lesion diagnosis. Aim: We address the limitations of current DOT imaging reconstruction by introducing an attention-based U-Net (APU-Net) model to enhance the image quality of DOT reconstruction, ultimately improving lesion diagnostic accuracy. Approach: We designed an APU-Net model incorporating a contextual transformer attention module to enhance DOT reconstruction. The model was trained on simulation and phantom data, focusing on challenges such as artifact-induced distortions and lesion-shadowing effects. The model was then evaluated by the clinical data. Results: Transitioning from simulation and phantom data to clinical patients' data, our APU-Net model effectively reduced artifacts with an average artifact contrast decrease of 26.83% and improved image quality. In addition, statistical analyses revealed significant contrast improvements in depth profile with an average contrast increase of 20.28% and 45.31% for the second and third target layers, respectively. These results highlighted the efficacy of our approach in breast cancer diagnosis. Conclusions: The APU-Net model improves the image quality of DOT reconstruction by reducing DOT image artifacts and improving the target depth profile.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.