ArticleJournal of the Indian Society for Probability and Statistics2024
Single-Index Mixed-Effects Model for Asymmetric Bivariate Clustered Data.
Article in Journal of the Indian Society for Probability and Statistics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Studies/trials assessing status and progression of periodontal disease (PD) usually focus on quantifying the relationship between the clustered (tooth within subjects) bivariate endpoints, such as probed pocket depth (PPD), and clinical attachment level (CAL) with the covariates. Although assumptions of multivariate normality can be invoked for the random terms (random effects and errors) under a linear mixed model (LMM) framework, violations of those assumptions may lead to imprecise inference. Furthermore, the response-covariate relationship may not be linear, as assumed under a LMM fit, and the regression estimates obtained therein do not provide an overall summary of the risk of PD, as obtained from the covariates. Motivated by a PD study on Gullah-speaking African-American Type-2 diabetics, we cast the asymmetric clustered bivariate (PPD and CAL) responses into a non-linear mixed model framework, where both random terms follow the multivariate asymmetric Laplace distribution (ALD). In order to provide a one-number risk summary, the possible non-linearity in the relationship is modeled via a single-index model, powered by polynomial spline approximations for index functions, and the normal mixture expression for ALD. To proceed with a maximum-likelihood inferential setup, we devise an elegant EM-type algorithm. Moreover, the large sample theoretical properties are established under some mild conditions. Simulation studies using synthetic data generated under a variety of scenarios were used to study the finite-sample properties of our estimators, and demonstrate that our proposed model and estimation algorithm can efficiently handle asymmetric, heavy-tailed data, with outliers. Finally, we illustrate our proposed methodology via application to the motivating PD study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.