Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39070664›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of particle therapy2024

Impact of Rectal Spacer on Toxicity Reduction in Men Treated With Proton Versus Photon Therapy.

Vishal R Dhere, Subir Goyal, Jun Zhou, Nikhil T Sebastian, Ashish B Patel, Sheela Hanasoge, Pretesh R Patel, Joseph Shelton, Karen D Godette, Bruce W Hershatter and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of particle therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Vishal R DhereDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Subir GoyalDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Jun ZhouDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Nikhil T SebastianDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Ashish B PatelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Sheela HanasogeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Pretesh R PatelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Joseph SheltonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Karen D GodetteDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Bruce W HershatterDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Ashesh B JaniDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Sagar A PatelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Rectal toxicity after prostate cancer (PCa) radiation therapy (RT) may be greater with protons compared with photon intensity-modulated RT, perhaps due to lateral penumbra and end-of-range uncertainty. Rectal spacers (RSs) have been shown to mitigate RT-associated acute/late rectal toxicity in men treated with photons. The relative benefit of RS in men treated with protons versus photons is unknown. We hypothesize that RS will confer greater bowel toxicity benefits in PCa treated with protons versus photons. Materials and Methods: We conducted a single institution, retrospective review of men receiving photon intensity-modulated RT or pencil-beam scanning proton RT for localized PCa. Four cohorts were compared: photon with or without RS, and proton with or without RS. Acute (<3 months), late (≥3 months), and most recent toxicity were compared among the 4 cohorts. The cumulative incidence of physician-reported grade 1 to 2 gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity (common terminology criteria for adverse events V5.0) was compared using χ Results: In total, 164 patients were eligible for analysis: 38 photons without RS, 50 photons with RS, 26 protons without RS, and 50 protons with RS. The median follow-up was 17.6 months. In proton patients, acute (6.12% vs 30.77%, Conclusion: The rectal spacer was associated with lower G1-2 acute and most recent GI toxicity in men treated with protons; this difference was not observed in men treated with photons. While this study is limited by sample size, a relatively greater benefit of RS with proton versus photon therapy was observed.

Indexed as

Late toxicityProstate radiationProton versus photonRectal spacerRectal toxicity

Identifiers

PMID39070664
PMCPMC11283227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.