Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39070661›Full record

ArticleResearch square2024

Barriers and Facilitators for Participation in Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Scans in Cancer Research: A Feasibility and Acceptability Analysis.

Thushini Manuweera, Keerthana Karunakaran, Camille Baechler, Javier Rosales, Amber S Kleckner, Paula Rosenblatt, Aaron Ciner, Ian R Kleckner

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Thushini ManuweeraUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore.
Keerthana KarunakaranMassachusetts General Hospital.
Camille BaechlerUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore.
Javier RosalesUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore.
Amber S KlecknerUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore.
Paula RosenblattUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore.
Aaron CinerUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore.
Ian R KlecknerUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore.

Funding

URCC NCORP Research BaseUG1CA189961 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Michelle C Janelsins, KAREN M. MUSTIAN · 2014 to 2026
$67.7M
UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER--CCOP RESEARCH BASEU10CA037420 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI MORROW, GARY R · 1985 to 2014
$21.1M
Cancer Control Research Training Curriculum (R25T)R25CA102618 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI JANELSINS, MICHELLE C, MORROW, GARY R · 2004 to 2018
$6.7M
Clinical and Translational Cancer Control Research Training ProgramT32CA102618 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Michelle C Janelsins, Gary R Morrow · 2019 to 2026
$2.7M
The Effects of Exercise on Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy, Inflammation, and Interoceptive Brain CircuitryK07CA221931 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI KLECKNER, IAN ROBERT · 2018 to 2022
$795k
Effects of exercise during platinum chemotherapy on neuropathy: examining the interoceptive brain system and inflammationR21CA259422 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI KLECKNER, IAN ROBERT · 2022 to 2023
$394k
NCI NIH HHS K07 CA221931NCI NIH HHS R21 CA259422NCI NIH HHS R25 CA102618NCI NIH HHS T32 CA102618NCI NIH HHS U10 CA037420NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189961
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: A growing body of research suggests that the brain is implicated in cognitive impairment, fatigue, neuropathy, pain, nausea, sleep disturbances, distress, and other prevalent and burdensome symptoms of cancer and its treatments. Despite anecdotal evidence of difficulties using gold-standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to study the brain, no studies have systematically reported reasons that patients with cancer do or do not complete research MRI scans, making it difficult to understand the role of the brain related to these symptoms. The goal of this study was to investigate these reasons and to suggest possible solutions. Methods: We analyzed data from 72 patients with cancer (mostly breast and gastrointestinal) from 3 studies: MRI was mandatory in Study 1; MRI was optional in Studies 2-3. Patients provided reasons for completing or not completing optional research MRI scans. Results: The percentage of scans completed when MRI was mandatory was 76%, and when optional, it was 36%. The most common reasons for not completing optional scans were claustrophobia (40%), safety contraindications (11%), discomfort (5%), a busy MRI schedule (5%), and the scanner being too far away (4%). Older patients were more likely to complete at least one scan (log(odds) = 0.09/year, p = 0.02). Conclusion: Although brain MRI is feasible for many patients with cancer, it can be difficult or not feasible for patients with claustrophobia, safety issues, busy schedules, or transportation issues. Improving communication, comfort, and access to a scanner may help. Reducing inequities related to study participation can improve research supportive care research.

Indexed as

acceptabilitybarriersbrainequityfacilitatorsfMRI

Identifiers

PMID39070661
PMCPMC11276008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.