ArticleResearch square2024
Standard diet and animal source influence hippocampal spatial reference learning and memory in congenic C57BL/6J mice.
Article in Research square, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Assessing learning and memory has become critical to evaluate brain function in health, aging or neurological disease. The hippocampus is crucially involved in these processes as illustrated by H.M.'s remarkable case and by the well-established early symptoms of Alzheimer's disease. Numerous studies have reported the impact of gut microbiota on hippocampal structure and function using pro-, pre- and antibiotics, diet manipulations, germ-free conditions or fecal transfer. However, most diet manipulations have relied on Western diet paradigms (high fat, high energy, high carbohydrates). Here, we compared the impact of two standard diets, 5K52 and 2918 (6% fat, 18% protein, 3.1kcal/g), and how they influenced hippocampal learning and memory in adult 6-month-old congenic C57BL/6J mice from two sources. Results: Using a hippocampal-dependent task, we found that 5K52-fed mice performed consistently better than 2918-fed animals in the Barnes circular maze. These behavioral differences were accompanied with marked changes in microbiota, which correlated with spatial memory retention performance. We next tested whether 2918-induced alterations in behavior and microbiome could be rescued by 5K52 diet for 3 months. Changing the 2918 diet to 5K52 diet mid-life improved spatial learning and memory in mice. Shotgun sequencing and principal component analyses revealed significant differences at both phylum and species levels. Multivariate analyses identified Conclusions: In summary, these findings demonstrate the diverging effects of seemingly equivalent standard diets on hippocampal memory. Based on these results, we strongly recommend the mandatory inclusion of the diet and source of animals used in rodent behavioral studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.