ArticleCureus2024
Comparison of Adding Sildenafil Versus Estradiol to Clomiphene Citrate on the Applebaum Score and Pregnancy Rate in Patients With Unexplained Infertility: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Endometrial dysfunction in embryo implantation: from molecular mechanisms to clinical management.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBoth sildenafil and estradiol are seen to improve endometrial thickness in patients with infertility who are undergoing clomiphene induction cycles. However, the correlation between endometrial thickness and pregnancy rate is debatable. This study investigated the effect of adding oral sildenafil to clomiphene citrate (CC), compared to adding estradiol valerate, on the uterine biophysical profile (Applebaum score) and pregnancy rate.
methodsThis was a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial conducted in Kisangani in the Democratic Republic of the Congo from October 1, 2021, to October 31, 2023. Patients with unexplained infertility were randomly assigned to one of two groups: the interventional, which was given CC (2 x 50 mg/day from day 3 to day 7 of the menstrual cycle) + sildenafil (2 x 25 mg/day orally from day 8 to day 12) or (ii) the control group, which was given CC (similar dosage as the intervention group) + EV (2 x 2 mg/day orally from day 8 to day 12), for a maximum of three cycles. Applebaum scores and clinical pregnancy rates were measured.
resultsPatients in the sildenafil and EV groups were similar in mean age (29.04 versus 28.89 years). Of the 74 patients enrolled in each group, 71 in the sildenafil group and 72 in the EV group received treatment and were followed to completion. The Applebaum scores were significantly higher in the sildenafil group than in the EV group (17.05 versus 15.14, respectively, P=0.000). In the sildenafil group, the clinical pregnancy rate was also significantly higher, at 28.92% versus 20.83% in the EV group (P = 0.04).
conclusionAs compared to EV, the oral addition of sildenafil to CC is associated with a good Applebaum score and a high rate of clinical pregnancy in patients with unexplained infertility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.