ArticleCureus2024
Experiences of Multiple Myeloma Patients With Treatment in the Palestinian Practice: A Multicenter Qualitative Study in a Resource-Limited Healthcare System.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Multiple myeloma is a crippling cancer that puts a significant strain on patients and their families alike. The long and exhausting treatment journey with the disease is challenging not only for patients but also for healthcare systems. This exploratory study was conducted to look into these patients' experiences with their treatment and explore their recommendations and views to improve the Palestinian healthcare system, which can be viewed as an evolving healthcare system within a resource-limited and developing country. Methods The consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) checklist was used for conducting this multicenter exploratory qualitative study. A total number of eight patients with multiple myeloma who received treatment in the Palestinian healthcare system participated in semi-structured in-depth interviews. The semi-structured in-depth interviews followed a set interview schedule. Thematic analysis of the data was done using the qualitative interpretive description approach. Results A total of 5.48 h (329 min) of total interview time was analyzed. Among the patients, 6 (75%) were males, 5 (63.5%) lived in urban areas, 5 (62.5%) reported satisfaction with their household income, 6 (75%) underwent bone marrow transplantation, and all of them (100%) had governmental insurance. The qualitative data that emerged after analysis were classified into three major themes and multiple sub-themes. The three major themes were: (1) treatment side effects, (2) factors affecting treatment experience, and (3) recommendations to improve healthcare service. Conclusion The results of this qualitative study offer insight into how people with multiple myeloma view the healthcare system in Palestine and shed light on the variable and challenging experiences with their treatment, side effects, and communication with healthcare providers within the context of a resource-limited and developing country. Future research should involve hemato-oncology doctors and benefit from their expertise in the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.