ArticleCureus2024
Non-surgical Treatment of Severe Drug-Influenced Gingival Enlargement: A Report of Two Cases.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Drug-induced gingival overgrowth in renal transplants patients.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Drug-influenced gingival enlargement (DIGE) is a well-known adverse drug reaction associated with multiple medications. Although a benign condition, DIGE can have a significant impact on patients' aesthetic comfort and function. A surgical resection approach is usually proposed to treat severe and generalized DIGE. In this report, we describe the cases of a 47-year-old male and a 58-year-old male, both presenting with severe and generalized DIGE associated with amlodipine, a calcium channel blocker used for hypertension treatment. A non-surgical, cause-related approach, including drug substitution and repeated sessions of mechanical instrumentation, led to the complete resolution of severe DIGE, with no recurrence observed after 18 months in Case 1 and 12 months in Case 2. Throughout the observation period, the bleeding on probing score decreased from 100% at baseline to 10% or less, and the number of periodontal sites with probing pocket depth ≥ 5 mm decreased by more than 90% compared to the initial assessment. Both patients reported a high level of satisfaction with the treatment outcomes. These successful results should encourage clinicians to give greater consideration to non-surgical management of DIGE as a less invasive option before proceeding to surgical treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.