ArticleCureus2024
Methodology Validation: Correlating Adherent Scalp Flaking Score (ASFS) With Phototrichogram for Scalp Dandruff Evaluation in Adult Subjects.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
- A Cohort Clinical Study on the Efficacy of Topical Salicylic Acid/Piroctone Olamine Dandruff Pre-Gel and Cleanser in Improving Symptoms of Moderate to Severe Seborrheic Dermatitis of the Scalp.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Scalp dandruff is a common dermatological condition characterized by flaking and itching of the scalp, affecting a significant portion of the population. Effective assessment methods are crucial for evaluating treatment outcomes. This study aimed to establish the reliability and correlation of three assessment techniques: Adherent Scalp Flaking Score (ASFS), phototrichogram using CASLite Nova, and the 60-second hair combing test. Methods This open-label, single-arm, single-center, prospective clinical study enrolled 12 adult subjects with mild to moderate dandruff. Evaluations were conducted before and after a standardized hair-wash intervention using three methods: ASFS, phototrichogram using CASLite Nova, and the 60-second hair combing test. The primary objective was to establish correlations between these assessment techniques. Inter-evaluator and inter-operator reliability were assessed using Fleiss Multirater Kappa. Results Significant reductions in dandruff were observed across all methods post-hair wash. The ASFS decreased from 23.67±2.06 at baseline to 6.67±4.46, showing a mean reduction of 17.00±5.22 (71.40%, p<0.001). phototrichogram analysis revealed that 60.42% of the total (n=96) scalp zones assessed were in normal condition post-hair wash compared to none at baseline. The 60-second hair combing test showed a reduction in non-adherent flakes, with 58.33% of subjects displaying light flakes and 41.67% showing no flakes post-hair wash. The chi-squared test indicated a significant association (p<0.001) between ASFS and phototrichogram results. Inter-evaluator variability for ASFS and the hair combing test demonstrated substantial agreement (Kappa=0.692 and 0.637, respectively, p<0.0001). Inter-operator reliability for phototrichogram also showed substantial agreement (Kappa=0.746, p<0.0001). Conclusion The study confirms the reliability and consistency of ASFS, phototrichogram, and the 60-second hair combing test in assessing scalp dandruff. The significant correlations of ASFS and phototrichogram via CASLite Nova validate their use in clinical settings. Comprehensive training for evaluators and operators is essential to achieve reproducible and accurate results. These findings provide a robust framework for future studies and clinical assessments of scalp dandruff.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.