Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39070398›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

A Machine Learning Approach for Early Identification of Prodromal Parkinson's Disease.

Anisha Vaish

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Neurological Voice Disorders.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Anisha VaishNeurology, Tesla STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering & Math) High School, Redmond, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parkinson's disease (PD) affects approximately 6 million people worldwide. Data analysis of early PD symptoms using machine learning (ML) models may provide an inexpensive, non-invasive, and simple method for the remote diagnosis of early PD. The aim of this project was to analyze voice, computer keystrokes, spiral drawings, and gait data involving PD patients and controls available in public databases using ML models and identify early PD characteristics that are more pronounced than others. An ML model was developed using Random Forest to analyze existing clinical data for PD patients, prodromal PD patients with REM (rapid eye movement) sleep behavior disorder (RBD) symptoms, and non-PD healthy controls. We reviewed and collected data from the UCI (University of California Irvine) Machine Learning Repository, PPMI (Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative), and Kaggle databases. ML analysis was carried out on voice samples in PD and RBD patients, computer keystroke data, spiral drawings, and gait datasets. The ML prediction model developed may be helpful in improving risk prediction for PD, enabling early intervention and resource prioritization. The ML study suggests that voice analysis is the most robust test, followed by computer keystroke data, spiral drawings, and gait analysis, in that order. Voice is affected even in RBD patients, revealing that it is a sensitive and early measure of prodromal PD. The low accuracy of the analysis indicates that several PD-positive samples may remain undetected and unclassified. Combining all four features, that is, voice analysis, computer keystroke data, spiral drawings, and gait analysis, may improve the overall accuracy.

Indexed as

early identification and diagnosis“healthcare tech contest”machine learning (ml)parkinson's diseaseprodromal

Identifiers

PMID39070398
PMCPMC11281860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.