ReviewCureus2024
Systematic Review on the Worldwide Disparities in the Frequency and Results of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) and Response to Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA).
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Resuscitation needs justice: an intersectional view on justice, equity, diversity, and inclusion.Resuscitation plus · 2026Article
- Dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients: a site-level analysis of the PAROS trial.Resuscitation plus · 2026Article
- Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This systematic analysis aimed to analyze the key patterns and tendencies regarding bystander interventions, emergency medical service (EMS) systems, dispatcher support, regional and temporal differences, and the influence of national efforts on survival rates in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). The studies published between 2010 and 2024 examining outcomes of OHCA, interventions by bystanders, and variables linked to OHCA were included in this research. The inclusion process was done under Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), where publications (n = 24) from various geographical locations, including a wide range of research methodologies, were included for this research. The thematic analysis used for the data analysis shows that bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) enhances the chances of survival. The effectiveness of the EMS system, the assistance offered by dispatchers, and the inclusion of doctors in ambulance services are essential components in the management of OHCA. Regional and temporal variations highlight disparities in resuscitation protocols, emphasizing the need for adaptable approaches. Observations from statewide endeavors emphasize the impact of these activities in fostering a culture of prompt bystander intervention. This systematic review presents a comprehensive analysis of research conducted globally, providing a thorough insight into the variables that influence survival rates in instances of OHCA. The review recognizes the importance of bystander CPR and effective EMS services, while also bringing novel perspectives, such as gender disparities and geographical variations that contribute to the existing body of research. Despite possible variances in the studies and biases, the findings underscore the need for tailored therapies and ongoing research to optimize strategies for controlling OHCA and improving survival rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.