Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39070375›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization of Scientific Literature on Heart Disease Classification Using a Logistic Regression Model.

Neena Suresh, Binu Thomas, Jeena Joseph

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Neena SureshDepartment of Computer Sciences, Mahatma Gandhi University, Kottayam, Kottayam, IND.
Binu ThomasDepartment of Computer Applications, Marian College Kuttikkanam (Autonomous), Kuttikkanam, IND.
Jeena JosephDepartment of Computer Applications, Marian College Kuttikkanam (Autonomous), Kuttikkanam, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the advancement in artificial intelligence, the use of machine learning algorithms for clinical prediction has increased tremendously. Logistic regression is one of the powerful machine learning algorithms that can be used to predict the probability of a variable. Logistic regression is very popular among medical researchers owing to its simplicity, interpretability, and solid statistical foundation. This study aims to investigate the research productivity of heart disease classification using a logistic regression model to analyze the current patterns and potential future trends through bibliometric analysis. Additionally, it aims to highlight the impact and quality of research in the area, identify prominent research groups, the countries actively contributing to the field, which will help the researchers and healthcare professionals to pinpoint research gaps, influential authors, and make informed decisions and invest resources accordingly. The data is collected from a database of Scopus spanning from 2019 to 2023. We have used two bibliometric software, Biblioshiny (Aria and Cuccurullo, 2017) and VOSviewer (Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS), Leiden University, the Netherlands), to analyze the bibliographic data regarding the citation count, contribution of authors, publication count, the contribution of institutions, etc. There are 2331 documents under study which were fed into both software to analyze the data. With 700 documents, China topped the list of most productive countries indicating the vast contribution of the country followed by India and the United States. Contributions of the Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States are found to be the greatest with six papers. The most productive author is Wang Y with 73 documents. Analysis of trending topics reveals that the field progressing towards using support vector machines (SVM), k-nearest neighbours (KNN), and naïve Bayes algorithms. The article has only considered data from Scopus excluding literature indexed in other databases which limits the potential coverage of the data. Also, the work focuses on recent developments excluding older literature from 2019 which could be a limitation. Furthermore, since the study is a bibliometric analysis targeting the use of logistic regression for heart disease prediction, powerful techniques such as SVM, decision trees, random forests, neural networks and deep learning have not been included, which could be another limitation.

Indexed as

bibliometric analysisbiblioshinycardiovascular diseaseslogistic regressionmachine learningvosviewer

Identifiers

PMID39070375
PMCPMC11283593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.