Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39070359›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

Paediatric Spinal Cord Injury: A Review of Current Management.

Chikolum Ejide, Soham Bandyopadhyay, Kokila Lakhoo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chikolum EjideOxford University Global Surgery Group, University of Oxford, Oxford, GBR.
Soham BandyopadhyayOxford University Global Surgery Group, University of Oxford, Oxford, GBR.
Kokila LakhooOxford University Global Surgery Group, University of Oxford, Oxford, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinal cord injury (SCI) in the paediatric population is considered a separate entity from the same injury in adults due to the unique anatomical, physiological, and biomechanical properties of the pediatric spine. No comprehensive, standardized, international guidelines currently exist for physicians to follow regarding the management of paediatric spinal cord injuries. Therefore, a narrative literature review approach was employed to explore the management of paediatric spinal cord injuries. The review adhered to the methodological frameworks that entailed identifying a curated selection of pertinent articles on the topic, rather than an exhaustive comprehensive search that is utilised in systematic reviews, this was followed by a reflective interpretation of their content. Using the electronic databases, PubMed and Google Scholar, a search of peer-reviewed studies conducted only in the English language was included. Only studies in which the full article was available were included. Paediatric populations are defined as individuals aged between 0 and 18 years. In total, 26 studies were included in our review. We conclude that it is necessary to factor in specific paediatric considerations, such as disproportionate head size, increased ligament laxity, increased prevalence of upper cervical injury, and future development of scoliosis, in the prehospital, medical, and surgical management of paediatric spinal cord injuries. Clinicians should be made aware of these considerations, as they can improve the outcomes in the paediatric population who suffer from this devastating injury. There is a lack of high-quality studies and data concerning the paediatric population who have sustained SCIs. This literature review highlights the available data and calls for more studies to be conducted in this field.

Indexed as

emergency medicineneurosurgeryorthopedicspediatricspediatric spinespinal cord injuryspine injuriesspine surgerytrauma

Identifiers

PMID39070359
PMCPMC11283304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.